Lets look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and builtin webhard

From Open Opus
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.



Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.



Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.

It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

웹하드 순위 OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage and also the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.



It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.



Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files online at a set monthly cost. Because of this the utilization of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.



In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.



Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.